Symbolic imageExperts expect Meta to fight $25bn New Mexico penalty on appeal
A New Mexico judge ordered Meta to pay $25 billion for misleading users about data privacy. Reuters cites experts who say the penalty has a strong chance of being cut on appeal.
Judge Francis Mathew signed the order on Wednesday, 21 October, after a Santa Fe jury found Meta liable in September in a case tied to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Jurors counted more than 43 million violations of the state's Unfair Practices Act, which at up to $5,000 each produced $219.5 billion; the judge cut that to $25 billion, with 15 percent annual interest until paid. Meta's chief legal officer C.J. Mahoney called the suit a "tax on speech" and said the company is confident it will prevail on appeal. Attorney General Raúl Torrez called the ruling a signal to Silicon Valley. According to Telesur, the money is meant for education, but Torrez warned that an appeal could delay it.
Mounting legal pressure on Meta
Earlier this year New Mexico won $942m against Meta in two trials over child sexual exploitation and platform safety, Al Jazeera reports. A multistate trial over allegedly addictive design began in a California federal court in August. The New York Times describes such lawsuits as a de facto regulatory regime forcing changes at Meta and Google.
Other opinions
Breitbart calls Torrez "Soros-backed" and cites an unnamed source alleging anti-Trump politics at trial. Al Jazeera and Telesur instead stress that Cambridge Analytica worked for Trump's 2016 campaign.