Symbolic imageMeta ordered to pay $25bn to New Mexico over privacy deception
A New Mexico judge ordered Meta on Wednesday to pay $25 billion for misleading Facebook users about data privacy. A jury had found the company liable in September.
Judge Francis Mathew cited the "extraordinary" number of deliberate violations, their duration, the involvement of Facebook executives and the "intentional and systematic" nature of the false statements, according to a ruling excerpt published by MLex. The case stems from the Cambridge Analytica data harvest. New Mexico had sought $35 billion to $40 billion, while Meta argued for no more than about $3.4 billion and called a tenfold higher penalty unconstitutional. Attorney General Raúl Torrez called the sum "one of the largest, if not the single largest state verdict against a company in American history."
Interest and appeal
According to Le Monde, the sum grows by $3.75 billion a year (15% interest) until paid. Meta has not commented on the amount but had said it would appeal, and Torrez acknowledged the money would be tied up during an appeal. Meta's shares traded 2% higher, the Associated Press reports.
Remedies still open
The judge has not yet ruled on the state's requested remedies, including an audit of Meta's handling of user data. Torrez said the penalties go to education spending. The ruling comes on top of $942 million ordered this year in a separate child-safety case in New Mexico, which Meta is appealing.